I need a new logo - designed a few - can't decide. Help a sista out by pickin' your fav.

Of the 3 choices - #1 by faaaaaaaaaaaaar.

Let's see number 2 with the font from #1

I like #2 because it's simple, clean, classic but modern (square format gives it that... in my opinion). The green and brown are a nice compliment to one another. Let us know what you go with!

I think I would like the first one if the font was turned like on the third one...or the second one with a brown dot incorporated somehow?

If you don't make any changes at all, I like the 2nd one best. Very clean/classy.

From the examples...number one.

I like #1 the best!

numbre uno!!

#2

2 and 3

i like #2

#1

I like #2 - simple and easy to read.

I really like #1. The others are too busy for me.

numero un.


(Tres french.)

defo number one, could you perhaps incorporate something into the circle on the bottom right to imply it was a lens?
steve

Definitely!!!

Can anyone explain why you think number one is the best? Chris and I have some graphic past and I think it's the weakest of all three. We think number two is the strongest followed by number three if there were some tweaking. Number one is hard to read and doesn't work well with the eyes and the ease of recognizing it. It takes work to read it. We are really curious as to why so many chose it. Do you like circles? We are just trying to understand where everyone is coming from with their opinions and making sure we give the best advice here.

Thanks!

i like two
it is the most simple, easy to read and clean

i strongly dislike 3 - very complicated and hard to read quickly

i am neutral on 1

i'm gonna rock the boat. i like #3, then 2 - and then 1.

3 is granny chic and feminine to me (but in a perfect world i'd take away the circles to make it a cross between 2 and 3)
2 is clean

I think #2 is the strongest. Simple design, nothing to figure out. Elegant font, elegant kerning, looks professionally designed to me, and the display font is unique and interesting, as opposed to "normal." The square design is clean and the color is attractive. I'm guessing those colors will be used throughout the branding.

The other two raise questions in my mind -- #1: will the circles be repeated elsewhere on the branding? Do they mean anything? Am I supposed to "get" something out of those circles? #3:I think the dingbats are nice, but am wondering why they are turned like that and what the point will be in cross branding throughout your logo services. Seems amateurish, unless there will be a cross-branding point somewhere else.

Just my .02

Edit to add: on #3 the dingbats are serving as pointers, but the big one is pointing to the tiny word and it's just making my eyes run all over the place. I love graphic pointing devices, but I don't think this one works very well.

#1 might look the nicest..

but IMO #2 is HEAD and Shoulders above the others as far as brandability


IMO #3 has way too much going on and difficult to read what your name is

#2
#1
#3

I only like #2 the best because I can barely see "photography" in the other two. I like the design of #1 best, but "photography" is so slim & tiny, it's hard to see. I'm not sure someone who didn't KNOW what it said would be able to recognize the word easily.

+1