dawn
February 23 2007, 06:26 PM
Sorry, I didn't mean to be mysterious! The thing is I don't like saying bad things about vendors with whom I have no direct experience. I have ethical problems with the way the owner of Skooks has run his business, and I chose to wait for PickPic to support a business that was doing things "right." Aside from the numerous customer service complaints, there are technical issues with the Skooks Kart and legal ones that I wanted to not support. Here's some additional info from
PickPic's FAQ; the entire FAQ section makes for very interesting reading, even for non-geeks.
Q:I saw something about litigation mentioned at the Skooks Kart site. What's that all about?
A: On May 12, 2005, it was discovered that Skooks Designs was providing some clients an online proofing system that contained both cosmetic similarities, as well as direct verbatim passages of code from PickPic. (One line even contained my own name in it.)
We alerted Brian Crouch of the infringement and he immediately agreed to remove the code in question, citing contractors as to blame. We took him at his word, fully expecting an immediate response based upon his assurances.
On September 20, 2005, we discovered rather accidentally that the code was still included in his installations. After seeking legal counsel, we took steps to notify those clients of Skooks Designs that were affected, asking for their cooperation in removing the code should we not get immediate results from Mr. Crouch.
After numerous exchanges with Mr. Crouch that were far from pleasant and only served to worsen the situation, he finally removed the code on October 24, 2005 — more than 5 months after it was first noticed and reported.
We, of course, reserve the right to legally revisit this issue at any time in the future, in accordance with the statute of limitations for copyright infringement cases.
HTH,
Dawn