Anne
February 4 2007, 07:37 AM
QUOTE(damian @ February 4 2007, 02:31 AM) [snapback]69481[/snapback]
thanks Anne! I actually totally agree with you about the whites. This was my quick and dirty way of making that photo look somewhat fashionable.
I heard that shooting in RAW leads to better gray tones. Do you know anything about that?
Could you explain more about gradient map?
RAW has a MUCH larger color gamut than JPG. Which means you get millions of shades of each color instead of a fraction of that. Once you edit a few events in RAW, you'll completely see the difference. The biggest difference can be noticed in the shadow and highlight ranges because you won't see as much clipping in both areas.
I'm pretty sure the way that gradient map works is that it takes the darkest point in the image and makes it black and the lightest point in the image and makes it white, regardless of the original original colors, whereas desaturate simply neutralizes the colors. To me, gradient map creates a look that is much closer to the high contrast black & white films that I love so much. When you look at the examples attached.... combare the differences in the color chart... but also look at the shadows on her face and the flowers to see how it handles the shades of skin tone. You'll notice there's a lot more differentiation between tones and shadows when using the gradient map (and more contrast).

After I use gradient map, the only adjustments I occasionally make are either auto levels or a bump in the middle curve to brighten skin tones. CS3 has a new Black & White tool in the adjustment layers which allows you to adjust each color tone for more or less brightness in the grays - so you can make red and peachy shades of skin a lighter glow. However, after trying it a few times, I still prefer gradient map the most because it's so quick and the results are usually the most consistently beautiful.