QUOTE(Mrs. V @ January 1 2007, 04:28 AM) [snapback]38384[/snapback]
I'm usually saddened and frustrated by the jaded, stubborn facade that people will throw up in the name of God. I find that these impermeable walls effectively prohibit Christians from being the beacons of caring and love that God wants us to be. Instead, I've known FAR too many people who were turned off by the negative, angry persona of modern religion before they were ever able to realize a loving relationship with Christ.
I can understand that. But I don't think it's limited to Christians
Along those lines I remember a story from a pastor I heard once, responding to a woman that thought the church was nothing but a "brood of vipers". This woman said that at least everyone in the world knew they were vipers, instead of denying it like church people. The pastor responded (and I paraphrase): "Well I would disagree with you. I think it's the church people that know they're a brood of vipers. That's why we're there."
"And you know," he said with a smile, "you're welcome to slither on down anytime..."
(she showed up the next Sunday)Fact is, try as we might, we can't seperate the Church and Christians from Christ. Jesus calls the church "his body" and he is the head. And one of my favorite authors, Dietrich Bonhoeffer says in his book Life Together (a book about Christian Community), that "We (Christians) are the physical representation of Christ to the world." I know that I have not always represented Christ well, and theree are plenty of people in church leadership who both now and in history have abused their authority. But the logical term for lumping the people who have given Christianity a bad name with the rest of the Christians Worldwide (2 billion according to the 1997 Encyclopedia Britannica--and most probably involved in what you call modern
religion) is called a
Hasty Generalization.

:-)
I've had my own frustrations and hurt from churches (almost to the point of giving up on church completely), but I have been incredibly helped by two books
Soul Survivor--How My Faith Survived the Church, and
Church Why Bother? Both by Philip Yancey. I am now convinced that not only is the church (a group of crazy messed up people--united in the fact that they have been given grace (undeserved mercy) from a loving God) God's plan and desire. But that it is the biggest help to us in growing in our love for God and other people.
You are right though. The most important thing is Love. If Christians--especially American and Westernized Christians--would really follow the words of Jesus, to
"Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength, and to
Love your neighbor as yourself."
We probably wouldn't have a need for this thread. :-)
Matt,
First off--I admire you for questioning. No matter what the motive (
though I am very curious as to what has been on your mind that you are asking). A mentor of mine once told and showed me that a faith that cannot take questioning (both internally and externally), is a blind faith.
In the Bible, a man named Paul writes "Now
faith is being
sure of what we hope for and
certain of what we do not see." I am confident that the Bible and Christianity can stand up to the toughest questioning. So I don't mind discussing hard questions. That said, I'll answer the easy ones you asked.
1) Non-christian wedding? Sure. Gay? Probably not, though I would be open to considering exceptions.
2)Maternity photos? I haven't yet, but I would like to. For me, tasteful is the key word. I love art, and I believe there is a difference between a seductive nude (one that is meant to excite sexual thoughts or passions), and an artistic nude. I don't think it is often hard to tell the difference.
3) Bar/Bat Mitzvah's? I see them as a traditional custom. I don't see why it would infringe on my faith to photograph them.
4) That Sunday thing. :-) I would prefer not to shoot a wedding on Sunday, but actually because of the commitments and connections I have in my church, not the Ten Commandments. I agree with the prior post that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.
The book of Romans Chapter 14 (in the New Testament--after Christ) that Paul guy talks about this very thing. It basically says (paraphrase) that you know, one man will consider one day (maybe Sunday) sacred and holy, another man will consider all days the same. Christianity is not about passing judgement on one another, but try to help each other as much as possible. To be true to your conscience, and what you feel God wants you to do.
Did you know that when Jesus was alive, before they crucified him, the religious leaders of the day got very mad at him for "working on the Sabbath"? In fact, they felt he was undermining their authority and disrespecting God and their scriptures because he would help people and heal people on the Sabbath. He told them "Look, if your sheep fell into a pit on the Sabbath--you would lift it out. Aren't people so much more valuable than sheep?"
Anyway, those are my answers. Now I am curious--What brings it up? And what do you think about all this? I have a feeling that behind the questions you're asking, you have bigger ones (perhaps about hypocrisy or inconsistancy? or what's up with the crazy Christians? ;-)) I'd love to chat about any questions or even accusations you or anyone else might have--if they're a little politically incorrect, or might start a fire here--just PM me. Understanding each other is the best way towards better friendships.
I hope that this was interesting, and that, at the least--I hope that everyone understands I write this with respect for those who disagree with me. :-)
Warm Regards,
~Christina Teichroew
P.S. If someone wants to reply to me directly, you may want to PM since I am not able to check the board as much as I like anymore.