Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Still working on this.....
OpenSourcePhoto > The Business Side > Marketing
Misty
Ok....you guys were so awesome helping me narrow down my logo options last time, and I got it down to one logo and had my designer do some variations of it. Please help me out by choosing which logo you like best! Also, do you like the butterfly touching the edge of the circle (like #2) or with some space around it like the others? Thanks so much, guys! You've all been an incredibly valuable resource for help on this. Don't know what I'd do without OSP! wub.gif

Ron A. from SC
#2
Monarch Photography
Ditto on #2
Ginger
Agreed #2
JoshuaK
Two is cool- but I think I like three better- everything feels somewhat spaced out in two in my opinion
Misty
Ok wow, that was fast LOL. So what is it about #2 that you all like? Is it because there's no line? Or because the butterfly goes to the edges of the circle? Or just the way the text is laid out? Would love any and all feedback. Thanks! You guys are awesome! biggrin.gif
Ginger
It's the spaced out feeling that I like in two. But I see where Joshua is coming from. Maybe beef up the text's weight in two and it should still be easy to read without looking too pushed together.

Hope this helps.
Lisette
I like #1 the best. I don't like 2 because it doesn't have the line. I think #1 would be better if the text was "thinner" smile.gif
drager
#4 looks nice and clean with a tweak of artsy with the circle.


katiebev
#2
littler chicken
Hey, this can cut either way, but my initial lean was towards #2 because having the butterfly out to the edge makes it look a little less like a butterfly. However, once I'd decided that, all I could see on the butterfly in #2 were the letters M & D--don't know if that is just me needing more sugar or intentional on the designer's part. And while I really liked the butterfly as a butterfly because it's clean and pretty and not a froofy butterfly, now that I have MD in my head I think it looks less clean now.

It is entirely possible, and probably likely, that it's me.
Kelly L.
I like #3 the best overall, but I like how in #2 the butterfly goes to the edge. But all the font and spacing of #3 looks good. For #2 I don't like that it doesn't have the line.
the real tami
numero uno. ph34r.gif
SarahQ
#1 - without the line
Brandi Thompson
I like #3. I don't actually like how the butterfly touches the edges on #2.. I guess I'm the odd duck out.
Hayashi
I like #3.

#1 - the font is too busy and kind of hard to read at a quick glance
#2 - I don't like how the butterfly is cut off at the edge. Seems like it needs more room
#3 - GOOD
#4 - the font is too blockish, doesn't make the circular butterfly button thingy.
JacquelynnBrynn
I like the full butterfly of #2 in the logo, I like the line, and the 3rd #2 font for your name...
Misty
QUOTE(littler chicken @ July 17 2008, 12:56 PM) *
Hey, this can cut either way, but my initial lean was towards #2 because having the butterfly out to the edge makes it look a little less like a butterfly. However, once I'd decided that, all I could see on the butterfly in #2 were the letters M & D--don't know if that is just me needing more sugar or intentional on the designer's part. And while I really liked the butterfly as a butterfly because it's clean and pretty and not a froofy butterfly, now that I have MD in my head I think it looks less clean now.

It is entirely possible, and probably likely, that it's me.



No its not you LOL....its actually supposed to be a butterfly made from my initials MD, for Misty Dawn. biggrin.gif Great insight though, thanks!

Thanks everyone for your input.....its so helpful to get other opinions on this stuff! This is such a hard process to narrow it down to ONE logo! But we're getting so much closer!! I'm excited!! Any other thoughts, please feel free to add!
cmiphoto
Trois!
Greta Reynolds
1
MelanieJ
I like #1 the best, maybe with a tiny bit thinner font on top, and a thinner line.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.