Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Copyrights?! ARGH!
OpenSourcePhoto > The Business Side > Forms, Filing, and Functional stuff
BethC
A friend of mine who is an artist and filmmaker just sent me this article. It is LONG and I haven't quite had time to finish it all of the way to the end and think about it. But I definitely thought it was worthy of posting here to share.




ALL ARTISTS MUST READ!

The US government, as well as a few countries in Europe are trying to pass legislation that requires all artists of any kind (artists, designers, musicians, writers, filmakers) to register their creations with private registries for a fee.

If creations are not registered, they become "Orphaned Works" which means basically that they have no copyright and become public domain- meaning that anyone can sell or distribute them without the original artist seeing any income whatsoever.

You can read more about it here:
http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=Columns...3605&page=1

Below is a link to sign a petition against this act:
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/no-to-...-works-act.html

Below is a link with the contact information for the president and all US senators, representatives, state governors and legislators:
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Please let us all as beings whom express themselves in creating and/or enjoy others' expression put a stop to this. Please Repost!

-----------------------------------------

Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All The Rights to Your Own Art

Mark Simon is mad as hell and, in this month's "Mind Your Business," he tells you why you should be too. April 10, 2008

By Mark Simon

As you know, I usually handle the subjects in my articles with a sense of humor. That is not the case this month. I find nothing funny about the new Orphan Works legislation that is before Congress. In fact, it PISSES ME OFF! As an artist, you have to read this article or you could lose everything you've ever created!

An Orphaned Work is any creative work of art where the artist or copyright owner has released their copyright, whether on purpose, by passage of time, or by lack of proper registration. In the same way that an orphaned child loses the protection of his or her parents, your creative work can become an orphan for others to use without your permission.

If you don't like to read long articles, you will miss incredibly important information that will affect the rest of your career as an artist. You should at least skip to the end to find the link for a fantastic interview with the Illustrators' Partnership about how you are about to lose ownership of your own artwork.

Currently, you don't have to register your artwork to own the copyright. You own a copyright as soon as you create something. International law also supports this. Right now, registration allows you to sue for damages, in addition to fair value. What makes me so MAD about this new legislation is that it legalizes THEFT!

The only people who benefit from this are those who want to make use of our creative works without paying for them and large companies who will run the new private copyright registries. These registries are companies that you would be forced to pay in order to register every single image, photo, sketch or creative work. It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense. This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free. In short, if Congress passes this law, YOU WILL LOSE THE RIGHT TO MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR OWN CREATIONS!

Why is this allowed to happen? APATHY and MONEY. Artists have apathy and corporations have money. We need to be heard in order to protect our incomes, our creations and our careers. GET OFF YOUR ASS! That means writing letters to our congressmen and representatives. That means voicing your opinion about how we need copyright protection, as we've had since 1976, that protects everything we create from the moment we create it. This is the case around the world.

However, an Orphan Works bill is also in the works in Europe. I was speaking recently with Roger Dean, the famed artist of the Yes album covers, and he is greatly concerned with what will happen if Orphan Works bills become law.

"This will devastate the livelihood of artists, photographers and designers in a number of ways," Dean says. "That at the behest of a few hugely rich corporations who got rich by selling art that they played no part in the making of, the U.S. and U.K. governments are changing the copyright laws to protect the infringer instead of the creator.

This is unjust, culturally destructive and commercial lunacy. This will not just hurt millions of artists around the world. "On the other side of the coin, what argument will a U.S. court have with a Chinese company that insists it did its research in China and found nothing? If the cost of this is onerous for a U.S.-based artist, what will it be like for artists and small businesses in emergent economies?"

If an artist whose work is as famous as Roger Dean's is concerned with this legislation, it should be of great concern for all of us. The people, associations and companies behind the Orphan Works bill state that orphaned works have no value. If that were true, no one would want them. However, these same companies DO WANT your work, they just don't want to pay for it. If someone wants something, IT HAS VALUE. It's pretty simple. Some major art and photography associations, or I should say, the managers of the associations, support this bill. The reason they support it is that they will operate some of the registries and stand to make a lot of money. Some have already been given millions of dollars by the Library of Congress. Follow the money and you will see why some groups support this bill of legalized theft of everything you have ever created.

Two proponents of this new legislation are Corbis and Getty Images. They are large stock photo and stock art companies. They sell art and photos inexpensively and are trying to build giant royalty-free databases. Do you see how they could benefit from considering most works of art in the world orphans? Do you know who owns Corbis? Bill Gates. He doesn't do anything unless it can make a huge amount of money. Helping you lose the copyright to your art is big business for Gates.

For years we've heard of Hollywood fighting with China to protect copyrights and stop the pirating of DVDs. Our government has worked with the studios to protect their investment. Our government is NOW WORKING AGAINST US by allowing our own fellow citizens TO STEAL OUR CREATIVE WORKS.

It will be easy for them to get away with it unless we make ourselves heard. Your calls and letters do work. I've seen many instances in which a single letter made a difference in public policy. Tens of thousands of calls and letters help even more. This is not empty talk. I have written letters to my congressmen and I will do so again. I do what I can to let every creator know about terrible legislation like this... thus you are reading articles like this one and you can listen to interviews I've posted online.

CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATOR:

Go to http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml to quickly find the phone number, address and e-mail of every U.S. senator, U.S. representative, governor and state legislator.

Forward this article to every creator you know and urge them to take a moment to protect their very livelihood. I am giving everyone the right to reprint this article in any form to help spread the word to protect our creative rights. Instead of sitting around watching TV tonight, TiVo that show, write a letter and make yourself heard. Letters to our government officials don't have to be long, but they should be heartfelt. A good story helps. Tell them who you are, how this legislation negatively affects you and that you want them to vote against the Orphan Works legislation.

It's that easy! If you don't, you will have only yourself to blame when you see other people making money from your art and you don't see a dime.

Spider-Man comic artist Alex Saviuk is also concerned about the loss of copyright protection.

"When I found out all the negative aspects of the new legislation, it would almost behoove us to want to do something else for a living," says Saviuk. "If we would have to register with all the different companies, we would never be able to make a living."

"It would be impossible for me to register all my art," continues Saviuk. "It would put me out of business."

Think this doesn't apply to you? Maybe you don't license your artwork? How about this? Photos on the internet could be orphaned. With tens of millions of photos shared online with services like Flickr, Shutterfly and Snapfish, there is a huge opportunity for unauthorized use of your photos... legally.

You could see photos you take of your family and kids, or of a family vacation, used in a magazine or newspaper without your permission or payment to you. You would have to pay to register your photos, all of them, in every new registry in order to protect them.

Say the average person takes 300 photos per year (I take a lot more than that). If a registry only charges $5 per image, that is a whopping $1,500 to protect your photos that are protected automatically under the current laws. If there are three registries, protecting your images could cost an amazing $4,500. Not to mention the time it would take to register every photo you take.

Plus, you will also have to place your copyright sign on every photo. That's not including all your art, sketches, paintings, 3D models, animations, etc. Do you really have all that extra time and money?

Plus, even if you do register, the people stealing your work can still claim it was orphaned and, unless you fight them, they win. Even if you win, you may not make back your legal fees.

It gets even better. Anyone can submit images, including your images. They would then be excused from any liability for infringement (also known as THEFT) unless the legitimate rights owner (you) responds within a certain period of time to grant or deny permission to use your work. That means you will also have to look through every image in every registry all the time to make sure someone is not stealing and registering your art.

You could actually end up illegally using your own artwork if someone else registers it. DOES ANYONE SEE A PROBLEM WITH THIS? Do you think the U.S. Copyright Office is here to protect you from this legislation? Think again.

Brad Holland of the Illustrators' Partnership shares his notes from a recent meeting with David O. Carson, general counsel of the Copyright Office.

Brad Holland: If a user can't find a registered work at the Copyright Office, hasn't the Copyright Office facilitated the creation of an orphaned work?

David O. Carson: Copyright owners will have to register their images with private registries.

BH: But what if I exercise my exclusive right of copyright and choose not to register?

DOC: If you want to go ahead and create an orphan work, be my guest!

This cavalier and disrespectful dialogue should have you seeing red. Who the hell does he think he is? Carson should be fired and RUN OUT OF WASHINGTON!

None of this could happen with our current laws. Our current laws work and they protect us and our creations. The only people who will benefit from the copyright law change are those who can't create work on their own or companies who stand to make a lot of money from using our works of art. They make contributions to congressmen, which is why they get what they want. We need to stand up and be heard. Every one of you need to write your senators and representatives.

We have to protect our livelihoods. It's that serious. Plus, the technologies being developed for locating visual art don't work well enough.

On March 13, 2008, PicScout, the creators of one of the software applications used in the registries, stated to the House IP subcommittee: "Our technology can match images, or partial information of an image, with 99% success."

A 1% margin of error is huge when you consider the millions of searches performed for art every day. That means for every million searches, 10,000 images could be orphaned. Plus, this only takes into account images registered on their system. If you have registered all your work on another system, they won't be searched here and, even though you may have spent thousands of dollars registering your creations, a new or unused directory could orphan everything you've ever created.

This is just one of the many reasons why INTERNATIONAL LAW FORBIDS COERCED REGISTRATION as a condition of protecting your copyright. The United States is about to break international law by making us register our works. The people behind the bill say it's not forced registration, but you won't have any rights unless you register. THIS IS SEMANTICS!

Of course, this is forced registration and we can't stand for it! There are many, many other problems with the Orphan Works legislation. As a creator, YOU MUST understand what is going on. For additional information on Orphan Works developments, go to the IPA Orphan Works Resource Page for Artists. This is not something that is going to go away easily.

We need to be vocal NOW! This legislation has been beaten or delayed for the past two years and they will keep trying until it passes. This is no time to be quiet and see what happens. What will happen depends on you. Send e-mails and call your congressmen. Ownership of your own creations depends on it.

Roger Dean sums this up well. "Where are the colleges and universities in all this? Has the whole world gone to sleep?"

GET ON ORPHAN WORKS E-MAIL LIST To be notified of the latest information on the Orphan Works bill and when to contact your legislators, send an e-mail and ask to be added to the Orphan Works list. AUDIO INTERVIEW LINK I have recorded a fantastic interview with Brad Holland of the Illustrators' Partnership regarding this bill and what it means to us as artists.

Please listen and learn more about how you may lose ownership of all your art and photos. This article and the recorded interview are available for anyone to use in print or online. Please forward this information to every person and group you know so that we can work together and protect our creations and livelihoods.

Mark Simon is an award-winning animation producer/director and speaker. He speaks around the world on subjects about art, animation and TV production. His copyrighted companies may be found online at www.SellYourTvConceptNow.com and www.Storyboards-East.com. He may be reached at marksimonbooks@yahoo.com. Portions of this article use information and phrasing provided by the Illustrators' Partnership.
Ryan Mc.
Sad isn't it.
I hope this can get stopped somehow.
I know a lot of the pro photoraphy business blogs are really talking about it.
SAS
This makes me sick to my stomach--the effects would be huge! How would we guarantee that the images we make of our clients don't end up in crazy, inappropriate places? YUCK!

Petition signed--off to write some letters.
MeeksDigital
im sure the PPA is involved. the best thing you guys can do right now is join PPA... they're fighting for all of us.
Becca Ellison
I am a member of ASMP (assosiated society of media photographers) it is like PPA but for commercial photographers... anyway, the lawyers for ASMP are all over the orphan works bill and lobbyists on Capital Hill working on it for us. There is a bill in the House and in the Senate right now that are slightly different. I just got an email from ASMP last week about it and here it is for you too see too:


Dear fellow members,

Late yesterday afternoon, two different versions of Orphan Works legislation were presented in each of the houses of Congress — a Senate version and a House version.

For over two years, Victor Perlman, the ASMP’s legal counsel, has been working closely with members of the government and other interested industries to gain improvements in the legislation. He is familiar with the people involved and has met with them to affect the changes reflected in the House bill. In working with the current subcommittee, he was able to reach them on many of our concerns. Subcommittee Chair Howard Berman was very responsive to our issues. I’ve outlined the highlights of the House version below. As you’ll see, there are many hurdles for infringers and protections for image creators that were not included in the original Orphan Works proposal or in the bill that died in the last Congress.

The House and Senate versions are basically similar. However, there are a few major differences in the House version that make it more responsive to our needs. We’re currently taking a position on only the House bill, and we’re continuing to discuss possible changes in the Senate bill with Senatorial staff. We will likely need to mobilize members to help influence legislators in both houses of Congress. We may need your help, so please be ready in coming weeks to take action. Thank you for your support.

The reaction of many is “Why support the House version?” Two main reasons:

The House version includes many provisions that are better than we had hoped.
It is our understanding that the next Chair of the House subcommittee that deals with copyright legislation will not be as responsive to our concerns as this current Chair.
It’s important to note that none of us has a bargaining chip here, only the opportunity to be heard on how this legislation will affect our industry. As Vic points out, “Politics isn’t about what’s fair or right; it’s about what is possible.” The improvements to the legislation are very much the result of Vic’s and other organizations’ efforts to change what was originally proposed.

Making a decision to support any Orphan Works Bill isn’t easy. However, both PPA and ASMP, the only two organizations representing photographers that have actively participated in these discussions, have determined that opposing the proposed House bill would place photographers at greater risk. We believe that supporting the House bill will prevent us from ending up with a law that is far worse.

Several other organizations have been supporting our efforts to negotiate improvements to the Orphan Works amendment. As I write, we are waiting to hear their response to the current proposals. I am very proud of what the ASMP has been able to accomplish by participating in the process that brought about the changes. My hat goes off to Vic Perlman for all his hard work. Cooperation between multiple industry associations enabled us achieve many protections and provisions that will make the Orphan Works legislation better for us all. I thank these organizations, Vic Perlman and the members of ASMP for helping support the efforts that brought the changes this far.

If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. I’d prefer to talk rather than email. We’ll do our best to update everyone as this legislative process continues.

Todd Joyce
President, ASMP
513-899-2727
joyce@asmp.org

I also urge you to visit www.asmp.org/orphanworks for more information. We will have new information posted later today.



Key differences in the House bill, compared to the 2006 version

A. Before using an orphan work, the infringer has to file a notice of use at the Copyright Office. Notice includes a description of the work, a summary of the search conducted, all identifying information found during the search, a certification that a good faith diligent search was made, the name of the user/infringer, and a description of the intended uses. Failure to comply loses eligibility for orphan works status. The Copyright Office must maintain an archive of notices of use.

B. If someone fails to negotiate reasonable compensation in good faith, or fails to make reasonably timely payment of the agreed-upon compensation, the ability to claim orphan works status is lost.

C. Useful articles (e.g. coffee mugs, key chains, t-shirts, etc.) are not uses that can qualify for orphan works status.

D. The Copyright Office must certify private databases that facilitate the search for pictorial, graphic and sculptural works. The databases must contain name and contact info for author, name of copyright owner if different, title of work, copy of the work (for visual images) or description “sufficient to identify the work,” mechanisms that allow search and identification by both text and image, and security measures to protect against unauthorized access or copying. The Copyright Office has to make a list of certified databases available to the public over the net.

E. Effective date for photos and other visual works is the earlier of (1) the date on which the Copyright Office has certified at least 2 databases that are available to the public, OR (2) Jan. 1, 2013; for non-visual works, effective date is Jan. 1, 2009.

F. The Copyright Office has to study alternative methods of dealing with small copyright claims. It must report to Congress within 2 years of date of enactment.

G. The Comptroller General is directed to study the functions of the deposit requirement in copyright registration, including historical purposes of the deposit requirement, the degree to which deposits are available to the public, the feasibility of making deposits (especially visual arts) electronically searchable by the public for purposes of locating copyright owners, and the effects that any change in the deposit requirement would have on the Library of Congress’ collection; and to report on the study within 2 years after enactment.




THis is a scary law that is trying to get passed for anyone who uses photography as their main income, especially in the Commercial industry (not trying to know the Portrait side of the industry, but the #s are just larger when you work with big companies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.