Just Sal
November 14 2007, 10:06 AM
Ok, so I signed up for pictage and I am not happy. I mean the services they offer our stellar, and the service....stellar, but is there anyway around FTP or DEC uploads taking a gajillion hours?????
I tried uploading 300 pics from an engagement session and it took all night!
What do you guys use? FTP, DEC, or just send in a DVD or something?
Let me know how to best leverage my time...thanks!
sdjeffy
November 14 2007, 10:24 AM
What DPI and JPG Quality are you saving your files as?
I use FileZilla and it works AWESOME. Better than some FTP Clients that I've paid for, and this one's free
JeffersonTodd
November 14 2007, 11:13 AM
It's best to save your JPEGS at quality 10 for upload. If your internet is still too slow for you then you can send in a DVD disc, but that won't necessarily be faster, it just won't bog down your internet connection.
*Troy*
November 14 2007, 12:50 PM
What JT said!
Go into BRIDGE (by Adobe)
Surf to the folder of images you want to upload.
Select ALL the images in that directory
in CS2 or 3 versions of Bridge -- select TOOLS > PHOTOSHOP> IMAGE PROCESSOR
I usually save in same location -- which creates a sub folder labeled at "JPG" -- then rename that folder with the Pictage job number -- point DEC at the new folder you just renamed to the job#
JPG Quality = 10
Click to view attachment
sdjeffy
November 14 2007, 01:30 PM
Exactly. What they said.
FYI, if anybody is uploading Images to Pictage at a JPG quality setting of greater than 10, you're wasting your time. Upon upload, all images are reprocessed to Q10 anyways.
Paul@lauraeatonphoto
November 15 2007, 06:25 AM
the upload speed is not Pictage but your ISP's upload speed. We have some jobs that can take 2 days to upload on our cable connection at home and thats the upgraded fastest they offer one from Comcast.
I still have a day job so I take them to the office sometimes to upload on my work's T3 line.. takes about 2 hours so I know Pictage can take them as fast as I can upload them.
jambon-beurre
November 15 2007, 07:35 AM
For Lightroom users, I've found that jpeg quality 90 is about right, and it's roughly half the file size of quality 100.
Spencer Clark
November 15 2007, 07:43 AM
QUOTE(jambon-beurre @ November 15 2007, 10:35 AM)

For Lightroom users, I've found that jpeg quality 90 is about right, and it's roughly half the file size of quality 100.
We tend to resize/constrain all of our jpg files to 2750 pixels in either height or width (using lightroom) and export at 100% quality. I read on one of Pictage's suggested resolution sheets that this will produce a perfect 12"x18" and 16"x20". So, that works for me. Just another way of doing this.

I would think the 80% or the 2750 pixels will actually result in roughly the same size file.
Just Sal
November 19 2007, 11:42 AM
Ok, I will try that, thanks for the feedback. Sorry about posting twice, could not figure out how to remove the second post.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.