Punam Bean
September 24 2007, 03:48 PM
Well... I don't think I'll be using Pictage anymore. I mean, what's supposed to happen if someone wants to order a print in bw? I certainly am not a fan of their yucky conversion. It just doesn't make sense to me. Thanks for the prompt reply, though!
QUOTE(davidnicholas @ September 24 2007, 07:36 PM)

With Pictage, the photographer uploads the EXACT hi-res image (in 4x6 ratio) that is used when Pictage fulfills a print order for the client. If the client doesn't provide a special cropping request -- say for a 5x7 or an 8x10 -- then Pictage will do the crop by default. (They also offer a B&W or sepia tone if the image is uploaded in color.)
When I was uploading images to Pictage, we usually saved the images as JPEGs in Photoshop with JPEG quality 10, since you're uploading the full-res image to Pictage which can take TIME. Quality 11 or 12 only doubled or tripled the upload time without any noticeable difference in print quality.
On the plus side, uploading full-res JPEGs means Pictage becomes a "back-up site" of sorts for your images. On the negative side, it means you're uploading fully edited images that take time to create and time to upload -- as opposed to uploading reasonably sized "thumbnails" that you can later enhance if someone actually orders it.
So you have to look at what works best for your business model.
Hope that helps.
David
P.S. I should also mention that I think Pictage also offers something like "custom prints" which means they'll do facial retouching, glare removal, etc... and there's an additional fee for that -- can't remember what that is because we're not currently using Pictage much anymore for online proofing.