Barefoot-Memories
October 12 2007, 09:34 AM
QUOTE(mattcam @ October 12 2007, 10:20 AM)

Can the EZ PhotoSales users comment on how they feel about the look of the galleries? Not knocking Carey here, but in the demos I have seen it doesn't have anywhere near the polish of Collages.net or the new Pictage interface.
I guess it's not a turn-off for your clients because everyone seems to be using it successfully. Just wondering if the look is a compromise or consideration for anyone.
The interface changes with the images, colors & fonts you choose.
The size of the thumbnails you use also makes a big difference in the look (I want to start using bigger ones. I think that looks snazzy).
Personally, I think that our galleries look a lot more polished and visually pleasing than some of the other "self-hosted" solutions, and the flexibility built in sure gives the photographer a lot of options for changing the look of the system. We keep the focus on the images, trying to keep text fine print OFF the main page (putting info in links instead of on the page, putting purchasing stuff in pull-down menus, etc).
If you set it up ugly, it will be a turn off for sure. If you set it up with polished professional header/logo and visually pleasing colors & fonts, it will look good. I think
my client galleries look good, but if you don't, oh well.
The coolest thing is that there are so many solutions with different looks, feels, prices, features, benefits, down sides, and photographers can look at all of them and figure out what will work best for their business. If a photographer chooses our system, cool! If he/she goes with something else, awesome. I hope it works well for what they want to do.
Of course, we always want to improve our system. I'm also working my booty off to try to get AfterShutter done. AfterShutter has features that none of the other systems have (self-hosted or commission based) that will really help photographers show off what they've got to sell. I'm off to work on some demo videos for that!
~Carey