QUOTE(bsteffine @ July 13 2007, 06:01 AM)

Anyone else out there with CS3 experience, feedback, complaints, praise, comparisons?
I'm not very familiar with Camera Raw - I use LR for all raw processing (as well as importing jpegs the same as you would raw, then tweaking them just the same, then exporting corrected jpegs). LR just seems much faster to do this sort of work as there are no tabs and what not.
If you run a Mac, CS3 is essential as it'll run about 3 times faster than CS2 on intel machines.
Outside of that, the overall interface is a bit cleaner I guess, but if all you're really doing is basic color correction stuff, then I can't say it's really worth it or not. The new B&W filter in CS3 is awesome.
The new Bridge CS3 is also leaps ahead - it's actually fast enough to use smoothly now. Bridge CS2 was too clunky and slow to be of any actual use (IMO).
I guess it's my opinion that professionals should always use the best tools available so in that light, PS is your digital darkroom - why wouldn't you own the best version available? The upgrade on PS alone is only like $150? The entire Creative Suite can be upgraded for only about $500 if I remember right.