Well, I have a canvas from all three places: WHCC, P2c, and Simply Canvas.
WHCC: this canvas came back looking all wonky, the color tones were off: a bit green or yallow and had just a blah muted feeling to them (I ***LOVE*** all my prints from them) and it has been over a year since I ordered that canvas from them. The turn around time was fast.
P2C: These guys are AWESOME...they have great cs, a fun attitude and the canvases color is rich and true to my monitor and they are very professional. The only thing I feel that the turn around time os too long, but at the same time, I know that good work takes time.
Simply Canvas: I just ordered 5 wraps from them. My first time. And doing the "extra steps" really took no time for me. The turn around time was FAST and the images have such a rich color to them...really nice product. AS far as them not backing the wraps, I was told and this is what I did, was to put a note that you would like the backs to be finished, and they did at no extra charge.
So here is my 2 cents from my samples :
Qaulity: This is a tie between P2C and Simply Canvas
Customer Services: Again a tie between the two, but P2C is definately a TON more fun and their packaging and little instruction papers are GREAT!!!
Turn Around time: Simply canvas: It was super fast!
For my future orders, if I need one quick, I will order from Simply Canvas. If it doesn't really matter- then P2C it is...I love to see what duck I am going to get in the mail.

Hope that helps!
QUOTE(mattcam @ June 1 2007, 12:15 PM) [snapback]145337[/snapback]
Melody,
Not doubting, just curious...
When you compared all the companies did you use the same image, same size, same everything? Otherwise, it may not be a fair comparison. I'm currently doing this now with a few labs for regular prints (not canvas) and I'm using the exact same files.
As I was typing, I was thinking that it would be nice to have the same image etc....just to compare. And the fact that is has been some time since I ordered a canvas from WHCC, could also partly be because by images have really improved over time???? Good point