OpenSourcePhoto: Two Camera Coverage - OpenSourcePhoto

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Two Camera Coverage What lenses make the best double team?

#1 User is offline   Spencer Clark 

  • You can now change your title :)
  • Group: Love Cat
  • Posts: 316
  • Joined: 17-January 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta, Ga
  • * Required * First & Last Name:Spencer Clark

Posted 19 February 2007 - 04:59 PM

Hi Everyone,

So, I have my own ideas on this one, but, I could very well be wrong. :)

My wife and I will be shooting weddings together at every wedding we book. I was just wondering - which lens combinations work the best for those that always have two photographers present at weddings or events?

Right now, I am thinking we should use the 24-70 2.8 L Series & the 70-200 2.8 L IS lens. With this, one would be able to get tighter shots or take photographs from a distance. Then again, two 24-70s might be better. The only L series lens we have at the moment is the 24-70, so we'd be investing in the next one. (So you know, we also have an 18-55 standard lens & a standard telephoto lens 75-300 ... they are not nearly as good as our new L series lens)

Lets assume we'll both be shooting with Canon 5Ds.

The question is, which lenses make the best team(s) for weddings?

- Spencer Clark
0

#2 User is offline   Brian Choi 

  • Spain's 1st Division
  • Group: Knowledge Cat
  • Posts: 165
  • Joined: 09-May 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, IL
  • * Required * First & Last Name:Brian Choi

Posted 21 February 2007 - 12:34 PM

While two 24-70s sounds nice, I recommend that you go for the variety (24-70 + 70-200) as the lenses are interchangeable. Maybe throw an inexpensive prime lens such as a 50mm/85mm/100mm in case one of the zooms malfunctions.
0

#3 User is offline   amber holritz 

  • I don't love in slices...
  • Group: Love Cat
  • Posts: 4,121
  • Joined: 04-May 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Chattanooga, TN
  • Interests:Um. Well.I like Nathan. and chocolate milk. Sometimes I like my kids. Okay, more than sometimes.Oh... I'm a vampire.

    I love lamp.
  • * Required * First & Last Name:Amber Holritz

Posted 21 February 2007 - 12:43 PM

We use a 17-55 2.8 on one cam and a 70-200 2.8 VR on the other.

When we double up, we double up using the 70-200's.

Don't get stuck in the midrange... extremes are good!
nikon geekette...amber holritz

the lifestyle baby photographer
Holritz Photography

brought to you by... Photographer's Edit
0

#4 User is offline   Floyd 

  • Doo wah diddy diddy dum diddy do!
  • Group: Love Cat
  • Posts: 1,205
  • Joined: 17-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southern California
  • Interests:You!
  • * Required * First & Last Name:...as in "Pink"

Posted 21 February 2007 - 01:07 PM

This kind of question is best answered by analysing your own style. There really is no "best combination" here. Most people typically run with three basic focal lengths: wide, medium, and long.

My wife and I shoot together. I carry two bodies (one with a 16-35, the other with a 70-200). My wife carries one body with a 28-70. Quite often, however, we swap cameras depending on the situation. And, at times, we need to change out the 28-70 for a fisheye or low-light prime. Other times, we wish we had two wides or two long zooms.

One other factor is location. Again, depending on your working conditions, you may be limited in your use of certain lenses. For example: The event is taking place in tight quarters where a long zoom just cannot be used.

It's just makes to have most focal lengths covered from a preparation standpoint, but weighing the usefulness of certain combinations is really dependent on several factors.

But if you're simply asking what lens you should get next...I'd say go with a 70-200.

Cheers! :)
f palitang photography
Behind the Viewfinder

"Beauty is in the heart of the beholder" ~ fp
0

#5 User is offline   Cory Parris 

  • PhotoGeek
  • Group: Love Cat
  • Posts: 863
  • Joined: 22-March 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:My wife and kids, photography, computers, books, and sports (yeah seahawks!).
  • * Required * First & Last Name:Cory Parris

Posted 21 February 2007 - 01:35 PM

It depends on what you are both comfortable shooting with. I shoot more wide and my wife likes more telephoto. Go to your strengths and you will have a good variety of coverage.
Cory
0

#6 User is offline   stephen seward 

  • Jedi Photographer
  • Group: Love Cat
  • Posts: 1,042
  • Joined: 30-March 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. Louis, MO

Posted 21 February 2007 - 01:45 PM

I'd want both shooters to have equal coverage because you never know what you'll need in each scenario. I wouldn't want to limit each shooter to a certain focal length.

I think this would be the optimum FF 2nd shooter set up

5D (as you stated)
35mm 2.0
50mm 1.8
85mm 1.8

inexpensive without losing quality and getting a good range of focal lengths covered
0

#7 User is offline   jr2 

  • English Premier League
  • Group: Knowledge Cat
  • Posts: 201
  • Joined: 05-March 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kansas
  • Interests:.
  • * Required * First & Last Name:Jason Ryman

Posted 23 February 2007 - 08:02 AM

Not sure for two shooters, but I carry two 20D bodies 95% of the time. Usually one with a 70-200 f/2.8 IS L and the other with a Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6.

Occasionally, I'll swap the 10-20 for a Canon 28-70 f/2.8L or I'll grab a 3rd 20D body for it.

I use a Canon 17-40 F/4.0L and the 70-200 for the formals.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


IPB skins developed by: eXtremepixels